Why “hunter mentality” should be avoided or rephrased:
1. Aggressive, outdated metaphor
- “Hunter” is an old-school sales archetype rooted in an aggressive, transactional mindset—closing fast, moving on, and working alone1. Modern sales often demand collaboration, long sales cycles, and post-sale relationship building, making this term increasingly misaligned with how sales actually works.
🔍 This metaphor suggests aggression over strategy or empathy, which can alienate high-performing candidates who excel at relationship-driven or consultative sales.
2. Gender-coded and exclusionary language
- “Hunter” is part of a masculine-coded lexicon in job ads that subtly signals to some candidates—especially women and underrepresented groups—that they may not belong2. Research shows this kind of language can reduce application rates from otherwise qualified, diverse applicants3.
🔍 Inclusive job descriptions correlate with stronger applicant pools and better long-term performance.
3. Poor signal-to-noise ratio
- The term fails to convey what behaviors are expected. Does “hunter” mean cold-calling 50 people a day? Closing $1M deals? Expanding a greenfield territory? Without clarity, you risk attracting the wrong candidates or deterring strong ones who simply don’t resonate with the metaphor4.
✅ Better alternatives to “hunter mentality”:
Instead of saying:
We’re looking for someone with a hunter mentality…
Try:
- We’re looking for a proactive sales professional who excels at identifying and closing new business opportunities in untapped markets.
- Ideal candidates thrive in outbound sales, self-generate pipeline, and build relationships from the ground up.
- Success in this role requires initiative, resilience, and the ability to prospect and close complex deals independently.
📚
Footnotes
- Harvard Business Review. “The End of Solution Sales.” HBR, 2012. https://hbr.org/2012/07/the-end-of-solution-sales ↩
- Gaucher, Danielle et al. “Evidence That Gendered Wording in Job Advertisements Exists and Sustains Gender Inequality.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2011. ↩
- Textio. “The Language of Inclusion.” Hiring Data Insights, 2020. ↩
- Sullivan, John. “Avoid Costly Hiring Mistakes: The Right Way to Write Job Descriptions.” ERE.net, 2020. ↩
About the Author
