Dealing with fake candidates is an increasingly common challenge in recruiting, particularly for remote or highly technical roles. These individuals often misrepresent their qualifications, provide false information on resumes, or even send imposters to interviews. To mitigate this risk, recruiters should adopt a multilayered approach that begins with vigilant resume screening. Common red flags include vague timelines, repetitive or overly generic job descriptions, inconsistencies in job titles or locations, and discrepancies between LinkedIn profiles and submitted resumes. For technical roles, it’s useful to cross-reference claimed experience with public repositories such as GitHub or portfolio websites. Performing a reverse image search on a candidate’s profile photo can also help identify impersonators.
During interviews, recruiters should implement several strategies to validate authenticity. Requiring cameras to be turned on in video interviews is an important first step, and when appropriate and legally permissible, asking candidates to briefly verify their identity with a photo ID can prevent deception. Behavioral indicators such as delayed responses, unusual background noises, or lip-syncing can be signs of fraud. Incorporating live skills assessments—such as coding challenges or scenario-based problem-solving—helps verify real-time capabilities. It’s also effective to ask follow-up questions tied to a candidate’s past experience, focusing on personal involvement, decisions made, and tools used. Repeating key questions across multiple interview rounds in slightly different forms can help confirm consistency in responses. For technical candidates, asking for specific UI details or keyboard shortcuts can help reveal whether they’ve actually used the tools they claim to know.
Beyond the interview process, technical and background verification steps are essential. Reference checks should be conducted with direct supervisors or peers rather than HR contacts whenever possible, with questions centered on the candidate’s specific contributions. Employment history should be confirmed through reliable third-party background check services. If there is still doubt, consider assigning a small paid work trial with clearly defined parameters, or request samples of past work and verify authorship through follow-up discussion.
When a fake candidate is identified, it is important to document all red flags and interactions. Communication should remain professional, with a standard withdrawal message informing the candidate that the company will not be proceeding. The individual should be flagged or blacklisted in the applicant tracking system to prevent future applications. If the candidate was submitted by a recruiting agency, the agency should be informed immediately to maintain quality control.
To prevent future occurrences, organizations should rely on trusted and pre-vetted talent sources where possible, such as curated platforms like Toptal or Braintrust. Job applications can include an honesty clause stating that any misrepresentation is grounds for disqualification. Standardizing live video interviews early in the process helps screen out unqualified candidates quickly. Finally, internal teams should be trained to identify common fraud patterns and encouraged to share emerging red flags across the recruiting function.
About the Author
